Ogilvie Syndrome and Acute Kidney Injury: A Rare Complication of Cesarean Section and Preeclampsia.

Ogilvie syndrome, or acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPS) is a rare occurrence, usually following surgery. It consists of a massive dilatation of the cecum, whose diameter becomes greater than 10 cm; its severity is variable, but, if not promptly recognized, it may be life-threatening. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is reported in this context due to both septic complications and to effective hypovolemia. ACPS most commonly affects males and individuals older than 60. In women, the median age at diagnosis is lower due to a strong association with Caesarean sections. The differential diagnosis after delivery may be challenging, due to a potential overlap of symptoms with preeclampsia or hemolysis low platelet elevated liver enzymes (HELLP) syndrome, both associated with AKI. The case herein discussed, regarding a 35-year-old woman, who developed AKI and Ogilvie syndrome after a Caesarean section for preeclampsia, may exemplify these diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, and is intended to raise awareness on this unusual complication of Caesarean delivery.

Toward an individualized determination of dialysis adequacy: a narrative review with special emphasis on incremental hemodialysis.

INTRODUCTION: The search for the 'perfect' renal replacement therapy has been paralleled by the search for the perfect biomarkers for assessing dialysis adequacy. Three main families of markers have been assessed: small molecules (prototype: urea); middle molecules (prototype ß2-microglobulin); comprehensive and nutritional markers (prototype of the simplified assessment, albumin levels; composite indexes as malnutrition-inflammation score). After an era of standardization of dialysis treatment, personalized dialysis schedules are increasingly proposed, challenging the dogma of thrice-weekly hemodialysis. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we describe the advantages and limitations of the approaches mentioned above, focusing on the open questions regarding personalized schedules and incremental hemodialysis. EXPERT OPINION: In the era of personalized dialysis, the assessment of dialysis adequacy should be likewise personalized, due to the limits of 'one size fits all' approaches. We have tried to summarize some of the relevant issues regarding the determination of dialysis adequacy, attempting to adapt them to an elderly, highly comorbidity population, which would probably benefit from tailor-made dialysis prescriptions. While no single biomarker allows precisely tailoring the dialysis dose, we suggest using a combination of clinical and biological markers to prescribe dialysis according to comorbidity, life expectancy, residual kidney function, and small and medium-size molecule depuration.

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Patients on Dialysis in Italy and France.

INTRODUCTION: Patients on dialysis (HDPs) are a category at high risk from COVID-19 and thus a high-priority group for vaccination. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy has been a concern since the availability of the first vaccine. The objective of this study was to determine hesitancy rates and factors associated with hesitancy toward COVID-19 vaccination in HDP. METHODS: HDP were surveyed with an ad hoc questionnaire in 4 large dialysis facilities in Europe: Le Mans and Paris, in France, and Cagliari and Pavia, in Italy. The questionnaire explored different domains associated with vaccine hesitancy, such as perception of disease severity, sources of information about the vaccine and the disease, and confidence in the health care system. RESULTS: A total of 417 patients (average age 69 years, 60% men) agreed to answer the questionnaire. Hesitancy was associated with younger age (P = 0.003), lower perception of disease severity (P < 0.001) and vaccine efficacy (P < 0.001), and lower trust in vaccination (P < 0.001) and in the health care system and scientists (P < 0.001) in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate models, concerns about side effects (P = 0.004) and vaccine efficacy (P < 0.001) and living in France (P = 0.04) remained associated with higher vaccine hesitancy, whereas having received an influenza vaccine (P = 0.032) and trusting scientists (P = 0.032) were associated with a more positive attitude toward vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: HDPs have a good understanding of the risks associated with COVID-19. Vaccine hesitancy was not associated with educational level, age, or gender but rather with lack of confidence in vaccine efficacy and concerns about safety. HDPs were quite skeptical about the health care system but generally trusted scientists.